A recent press release claimed that President Donald Trump stated, "Drones over New Jersey were conventional aircraft." However, Trump himself did not make this statement. Instead, it was issued by a spokesperson, raising questions about its accuracy and intent. This statement also contradicts previous comments from his administration and the broader unfolding of events related to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). The cautious wording appears designed to downplay the situation. But why the sudden shift?

Trump’s Stance on UAP Disclosure

Despite the spokesperson’s comments, Trump has maintained his interest in unveiling the mystery surrounding UAPs. In recent remarks, he reiterated his administration’s commitment, stating, "We're going to get to the bottom of this." His son, Donald Trump Jr., has also remained engaged in the discussion, asserting, "This isn't going away."

Several high-profile political figures, including Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, John Ratcliffe, Kash Patel, Tulsi Gabbard, and Trump Jr., are reportedly working together to push for more transparency. Meanwhile, reports of UAP sightings continue to surface, challenging the official narrative that the incidents have ceased.

A Timeline of Conflicting Statements

November 30, 2024 – U.S. Officials Say They Have No Answers

During a congressional hearing on UAPs, representatives from the FBI, CIA, DHS, Pentagon, and FAA were asked who was responsible for these unidentified aerial phenomena. Their response was unanimous: "We have no knowledge of who is operating these UAPs."

This statement suggests a lack of government oversight or awareness, contradicting later claims by the White House.

Late December 2024 – Reports Suggest Sightings Have Stopped

Federal and state officials announced that drone sightings had ended. Media outlets echoed these claims, with news sources such as ABC Local 7 News Colorado reporting that the issue had been resolved.

However, social media platforms, including TikTok, Reddit, and X (formerly Twitter), were flooded with new footage of UAPs. Law enforcement agencies continued to receive reports, indicating that sightings were ongoing despite official claims to the contrary.

January 28, 2025 – White House Claims FAA Approved the Flights

In a press briefing, the White House stated, "The FAA authorized these flights; they pose no public threat." This explanation provided reassurance but raised further questions about why previous statements denied knowledge of the incidents.

January 29, 2025 – A Sudden Shift in the Narrative

Just one day later, the White House changed its stance, stating that the FAA had not just approved the flights but had conducted them for research purposes. This new explanation contradicted both earlier statements and public skepticism about the government's handling of UAP disclosures.

January 30, 2025 – FAA Denies Involvement

In a final twist, the FAA issued a statement denying that it had authorized or conducted any of the reported flights. This marked yet another reversal, fueling speculation about whether the government was withholding information or simply lacked control over the situation.

The Bigger Picture

Over the span of just two months, official explanations regarding UAPs have changed multiple times:

• November 30, 2024: Officials claim no knowledge of the incidents.

• Late December 2024: Reports claim sightings have ceased, though public evidence suggests otherwise.

• January 28, 2025: The White House states the FAA approved the flights.

• January 29, 2025: The White House claims the FAA conducted the flights.

• January 30, 2025: The FAA denies both authorization and involvement.

While officials struggle to present a consistent narrative, UAP sightings continue, raising concerns about transparency and government oversight.

What Comes Next?

With public interest in UAPs at an all-time high, ongoing scrutiny is essential. As new information emerges, it is crucial to track and analyze official statements to identify inconsistencies and gaps in transparency. This report is part of an ongoing effort to document government responses to UAP incidents. If more details come to light, updates will follow to ensure an accurate record of how this story develops.