Mystery Drone Sightings

A recent press release claimed that President Donald Trump stated, "Drones over New Jersey were conventional aircraft." However, Trump himself did not make this statement. Instead, it was issued by a spokesperson, raising questions about its accuracy and intent. This statement also contradicts previous comments from his administration and the broader unfolding of events related to Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). The cautious wording appears designed to downplay the situation. But why the sudden shift?Trump’s Stance on UAP DisclosureDespite the spokesperson’s comments, Trump has maintained his interest in unveiling the mystery surrounding UAPs. In recent remarks, he reiterated his administration’s commitment, stating, "We're going to get to the bottom of this." His son, Donald Trump Jr., has also remained engaged in the discussion, asserting, "This isn't going away."Several high-profile political figures, including Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, John Ratcliffe, Kash Patel, Tulsi Gabbard, and Trump Jr., are reportedly working together to push for more transparency. Meanwhile, reports of UAP sightings continue to surface, challenging the official narrative that the incidents have ceased.A Timeline of Conflicting StatementsNovember 30, 2024 – U.S. Officials Say They Have No AnswersDuring a congressional hearing on UAPs, representatives from the FBI, CIA, DHS, Pentagon, and FAA were asked who was responsible for these unidentified aerial phenomena. Their response was unanimous: "We have no knowledge of who is operating these UAPs."This statement suggests a lack of government oversight or awareness, contradicting later claims by the White House.Late December 2024 – Reports Suggest Sightings Have StoppedFederal and state officials announced that drone sightings had ended. Media outlets echoed these claims, with news sources such as ABC Local 7 News Colorado reporting that the issue had been resolved.However, social media platforms, including TikTok, Reddit, and X (formerly Twitter), were flooded with new footage of UAPs. Law enforcement agencies continued to receive reports, indicating that sightings were ongoing despite official claims to the contrary.January 28, 2025 – White House Claims FAA Approved the FlightsIn a press briefing, the White House stated, "The FAA authorized these flights; they pose no public threat." This explanation provided reassurance but raised further questions about why previous statements denied knowledge of the incidents.January 29, 2025 – A Sudden Shift in the NarrativeJust one day later, the White House changed its stance, stating that the FAA had not just approved the flights but had conducted them for research purposes. This new explanation contradicted both earlier statements and public skepticism about the government's handling of UAP disclosures.January 30, 2025 – FAA Denies InvolvementIn a final twist, the FAA issued a statement denying that it had authorized or conducted any of the reported flights. This marked yet another reversal, fueling speculation about whether the government was withholding information or simply lacked control over the situation.The Bigger PictureOver the span of just two months, official explanations regarding UAPs have changed multiple times:November 30, 2024: Officials claim no knowledge of the incidents.Late December 2024: Reports claim sightings have ceased, though public evidence suggests otherwise.January 28, 2025: The White House states the FAA approved the flights.January 29, 2025: The White House claims the FAA conducted the flights.January 30, 2025: The FAA denies both authorization and involvement.While officials struggle to present a consistent narrative, UAP sightings continue, raising concerns about transparency and government oversight.What Comes Next?With public interest in UAPs at an all-time high, ongoing scrutiny is essential. As new information emerges, it is crucial to track and analyze official statements to identify inconsistencies and gaps in transparency. This report is part of an ongoing effort to document government responses to UAP incidents. If more details come to light, updates will follow to ensure an accurate record of how this story develops.

— February 02, 2025

Today, during a White House press briefing, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, speaking on behalf of President Trump, addressed the growing speculation surrounding the mysterious drone sightings reported over New Jersey in recent months. According to Trump, the drones are “authorized by the FAA for research purposes,” and, in many cases, are the result of hobbyist activity.While that explanation may initially seem like a step toward clarity, it raises more questions than it answers—serious questions that should leave every American demanding more than vague reassurances.The Official Story: FAA Approval and HobbyistsLet’s start with what the administration is saying. The FAA, according to Trump’s statement, authorized these drones for research purposes. This paints a picture of controlled, legal activity—whether for academic studies, testing new drone technologies, or private experiments. He also mentioned that many sightings can be attributed to recreational drone operators, essentially waving off public concern as a misunderstanding.But does this explanation hold water? Not when you take a closer look.The December Discrepancy: A Massive Communication BreakdownOn December 14th, a spokesperson for the Joint Chiefs of Staff issued a strikingly different account, stating that “the FBI, DHS, FAA, and DOD have been unable to determine who is responsible for flying the drones.” They added, “We have no intelligence or observations that would indicate they were aligned with a foreign actor or had malicious intent...but we don’t know.” (source)So, which is it? Are these authorized drones buzzing over U.S. airspace, or is their origin still unknown? If they were FAA-approved, why did multiple federal agencies, including the FAA itself, admit to being stumped?It’s not just a communication breakdown, it’s a full-blown institutional embarrassment. For months, investigators poured resources into solving the mystery: flight hours, radar upgrades, and congressional inquiries, all to determine whether these drones posed a threat to national security. And now, we’re told it was all harmless?Two Disturbing ScenariosHere’s the troubling reality: Either the government’s explanation is true, or it’s not—and neither option inspires confidence.Scenario 1: Interagency Failure on a Grand ScaleIf these drones were genuinely authorized, then this was one of the most shocking failures of interagency communication in modern history. How did federal agencies, including the very body that approves drone operations (the FAA), not know who was flying them? The public deserves answers and accountability. This level of disarray comes with a hefty price tag, and taxpayers shouldn’t foot the bill for what boils down to gross incompetence.Scenario 2: A Cover-Up of Epic ProportionsIf the official story is false, then this is far more concerning. Drones of unknown origin flying in U.S. airspace, sometimes causing airport shutdowns, are not a minor bureaucratic oversight, they’re a national security crisis. Whether these incidents involve foreign actors, rogue domestic groups, or something else entirely, dismissing them as benign without definitive answers isn’t just irresponsible; it’s dangerous.The Global Context: What About the Other Sightings?The administration’s explanation also conveniently ignores the bigger picture. Drones matching similar descriptions have been reported around the globe, often in areas far from hobbyist activity or FAA jurisdiction. In the UK, four U.S. bases experienced drone incursions, prompting the deployment of 60 British troops, activation of counter-UAV systems, and the presence of fighter jets in the area. Then, in December, Germany’s Ramstein Air Base, another U.S. installation, was also reportedly breached by these drones. We also had drone incursions over many U.S. military bases, including Picatinny Arsenal, Wright-Patterson, Naval Weapons Station Earle, Camp Pendleton, Fort Worth, and Utah’s Hill Air Force Base. Wright-Patterson even had to shut down its airspace for four hours due to the drones, only to report additional incursions just days later. Are we to believe that these, too, are coincidental or innocuous? If the public is being deliberately misled, the implications stretch far beyond U.S. borders.Move Along, Nothing to See HereIn typical Trump fashion, today’s briefing gave us exactly what we expected: a dismissal. “It was nothing, now move on,” was the unspoken subtext, as if giant drones causing airport shutdowns are just routine government work.But the stakes here are too high for flippant answers or political deflection. Whether the government is lying or simply incompetent, the public deserve transparency. If the administration thinks the public will simply shrug and accept these vague explanations, they’re sorely mistaken. The answers are out there, but they won’t come unless we demand them. For now, we’re left with the same uneasy feeling that started this whole conversation: Someone, somewhere, isn’t telling the whole truth.Stay vigilant. This story isn’t over yet.

— January 28, 2025

While U.S. officials have dismissed similar drone sightings in the U.S. as misidentifications, German authorities have taken a more assertive stance. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies suspect Russian involvement, particularly in light of the ongoing war in Ukraine. The German authorities are investigating these incursions as potential acts of Russian espionage.Adding fuel to the speculation, reports suggest that Russia may be using Orlan-10 drones—low-cost UAVs typically used for reconnaissance—to carry out these operations. These drones have been frequently deployed in Ukraine and are believed to have been used in previous drone sightings near critical infrastructure in Germany.With drone activity over military sites and vital infrastructure increasing, the European security landscape is becoming more complex. As investigations continue, it’s clear that these mysterious incursions could be part of a larger geopolitical strategy involving surveillance and potential sabotage.

— January 16, 2025

For 17 consecutive nights in 2023, numerous bright objects hovered over Langley Air Force Base, grounding military operations and forcing advanced fighter jets to relocate. NASA sent a specialized aircraft to investigate, but no clear imagery or identification emerged. Our top jets couldn’t intercept them, and every counter-drone measure failed. If these were just ordinary drones, how could that be?Would any enemy risk exposing their most advanced stealth technology repeatedly over a major U.S. military base without a clear purpose? And if so, what for? These objects weren’t hiding—they were illuminated and flying in formation while evading radar and advanced defense systems. Something doesn’t add up.Similar incidents occurred over RAF Lakenheath in the UK, a base historically linked to UFO activity and soon to house U.S. nuclear weapons. In the Midwest, law enforcement reported glowing objects circling nuclear missile sites, hovering silently for hours in high winds. Some officers even described a large "mothership" surrounded by smaller craft. What kind of drone could achieve that?

— January 16, 2025