Senator Mike Rounds to Address UAP Disclosure in Upcoming Interview with Ross Coulthart

There’s been a lot of speculation lately about whether Congress has lost interest in the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) issue. Journalist Ross Coulthart says that couldn’t be further from the truth.In fact, according to Coulthart, Congress is actively working behind the scenes and preparing to make more moves publicly. One of those major developments includes a new interview coming later this week on NewsNation with Senator Mike Rounds.Senator Rounds to Go Public on UAPSenator Rounds, a key figure who sits on both the Armed Services and Senate Intelligence Committees, has agreed to an exclusive interview with Ross Coulthart. The focus of the interview will be the UAP Disclosure Act, an amendment that previously faced resistance in Congress.Rounds initially helped lead the effort alongside Senator Chuck Schumer. That push stalled when other senators opposed the legislation. Now, according to Coulthart, the amendment has been rewritten and will soon be reintroduced in Congress.A Congressional Hearing Is ComingCoulthart says a Congressional hearing on UAPs is also in the works. “I'm told there will be a Congressional hearing and that they are determined to try to have a hearing,” he said. “The UAP disclosure amendment that was dropped… has now been rewritten and will soon be reintroduced.” He emphasized that while progress may appear slow, it’s often because Congress is dealing with many urgent global issues (war in the Middle East).Response to the WSJ ArticleRecently, the Wall Street Journal published an article suggesting that UAP sightings are not extraterrestrial or non-human in origin, but rather part of elaborate military hazing rituals. One example cited was the famous Malmstrom Air Force Base incident in the late 1960s. Some believe non-human intelligence (NHI) shut down nuclear missiles there. The WSJ suggested it may have been a military operation using technology that wasn't publicly available at the time.Coulthart strongly disagrees with this interpretation. He accused the WSJ of deliberately misrepresenting sources and said the article misleads the public.“We've now crossed the line where it can't be perceived as a simple error. What this is, is deliberate misrepresentation.”Coulthart believes the article may have been an attempt to discourage Congressional interest in the UAP topic. “Whatever it was that the Wall Street Journal was trying to achieve in their article, it will be demonstrated by Congressional interest that their attempts have failed.”What Happens Next?With the rewritten UAP Disclosure Act set to return, and a new hearing on the horizon, more developments are likely in the coming weeks. The upcoming interview with Senator Rounds may help clarify how much support the disclosure effort still has.

The Mysterious Death of Amy Eskridge: Is a Private Aerospace Company Hiding Anti-Gravity Tech?

In a recent and unsettling development, journalist Michael Shellenberger submitted a detailed timeline on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) to the U.S. Congressional Record. Among the many revelations included, one reference in particular has sparked concern: the mysterious death of antigravity researcher Amy Eskridge.Known for her work in advanced propulsion and her outspoken views on secrecy in scientific research, Amy’s story has taken a dark turn. Shellenberger cites retired UK intelligence officer Franc Milburn, who alleges that Eskridge was targeted with directed energy weapons and murdered by a “private aerospace company” operating within the United States. According to Milburn, the reason was clear: Eskridge was involved in advanced propulsion research and the broader UAP conversation:"Retired UK intelligence officer Franc Milburn claims she was targeted with directed energy weapons and murdered by a 'private aerospace company' in the US because she was involved in the UAP conversation and working on advanced propulsion."This claim, now part of the Congressional Record, forces a blunt question. Either private aerospace corporations and secretive elements within the U.S. government really do possess advanced technology that defies known physics, or they do not. There is no in-between. If Amy Eskridge was killed because of what she knew or what she was working on, then such technology must exist. The question then becomes: why go to such great lengths to hide it?Officially, Amy Eskridge is said to have died by suicide. But given the allegations now made part of the Congressional record, many are questioning whether that explanation tells the full story.Amy’s final interview, posted on Jeremy Rhys’ YouTube channel, only adds to the unease. She appears intoxicated, but she also seems deeply paranoid. She spoke of being followed, of people entering her home without permission, and even claimed someone had gone through her underwear drawer. This version of Amy is very different from the confident and articulate person seen in earlier interviews and public talks.One detail from her later comments stands out. Amy said that Hal Puthoff, a well-known figure in both government research and fringe science, once appeared at her apartment unexpectedly with a “whistleblower.” This encounter has never been explained publicly, and it raises even more questions about the people who were watching her and what they may have wanted.Her father, Richard Eskridge, a highly respected propulsion expert in his own right, has never publicly addressed her death. His silence is notable. Whether it stems from grief, legal restrictions, or fear is anyone’s guess.The inclusion of Amy’s case in Shellenberger’s Congressional submission is not just a strange footnote. It represents something bigger. If her death was indeed the result of her involvement in sensitive technology, then the stakes of the UAP conversation are far higher than most people realize. These are not just stories about strange lights in the sky. They are stories about control, secrecy, and potentially, lethal force used to protect unknown assets.Full Shellenberger Timeline submitted to Congress: PDF link – see page 207

Jesse Michels on Joe Rogan Experience #2331

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9Ldl70x5Fg

Joe hosting AJ (The Why Files) and Jesse in the same week is out of this world 👽

Jesse Michels Interviews James Fowler from Skywatcher

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_8IKKcTntQ

If you've been keeping an eye on the UFO/UAP world, a new name has been mentioned lately: James Fowler. He’s not just another guy with a telescope, his company has been involved in government wargames, high-tech signal detection, and now some seriously mind-bending skywatching. What he and his team are claiming goes way beyond the usual alien theories. According to Fowler, this isn’t just about visitors from another world, it’s about secret science right here on Earth.Here’s a breakdown of some of the wildest and most interesting things Fowler’s been saying lately.It All Started During Government WargamesFowler’s company first spotted UAPs while running military exercises for the U.S. government. They saw seven of them flying in tight formation, definitely not your average drone sighting. Since then, they’ve developed gear that can pick up signals coming from UAPs and track them in the sky.One weird pattern they’ve noticed: these objects tend to hang out right on the edge of where our tech can see them, as if they’re testing what we’re capable of. Sometimes they even dip just inside that range, like they’re intentionally messing with us.Cloaking, Holograms, and… Telepathy?Some of the stuff Fowler describes sounds like it’s straight out of science fiction. For example, he says some UAPs can cloak while flying, but the cloaking doesn’t work when they’re on the ground which means they might still be visible if you’re looking from the right angle.Depending on what kind of sensor you’re using (radar, thermal, optical) the same object can appear completely different, like it’s a projection or a hologram. Almost like it’s trying to throw off detection systems. Fowler mentions two events where UAPs reacted to human intent, like they could somehow read minds or sense emotion. He doesn’t jump to conclusions, but it’s clear he’s hinting at something way beyond standard tech.The Shift to SkywatcherFowler’s team has been watching the skies for about five years, but it’s only recently that they became more public. That happened when Barber and a group focused on psionics (mental/psychic phenomena) joined the team. Not long after that, they started spotting a new type of craft, the “Egg Class” UAP, which hadn’t been seen before. Coincidence? Maybe, but it’s definitely got people talking.UAP Crashes and the Drone MysteryAccording to Fowler, he’s seen four UAPs crash during his research. In one case, three Class 1 objects flew straight into the ground and never came back up on a day when hundreds of UAPs were observed in the area. He doesn’t claim to know what happened, but he’s sure they didn’t just vanish.As for the recent uptick in drone sightings, he’s got a grim take:“I think one of our adversaries has the ability to fly with impunity and operate in our airspace—and we are helpless to stop it.”That’s a scary idea: not only are unknown craft in our skies, but we might not even be the ones in control.The Tic Tac Isn’t What You Think?You’ve probably heard about the famous Tic Tac-shaped UAP seen by Navy pilots. But Fowler says what he’s seen is very different:“They’re actually more like a porcupine,” he says.Apparently, the craft has tiny spikes or protrusions all over it, which could be some kind of sensor array or energy field. He also points out that the government has never released the electro-optical footage of these things, suggesting they’re keeping a lot more under wraps than we think.It’s Not About Aliens, It’s About PhysicsHere’s where things get really deep. Fowler doesn’t believe disclosure is about aliens at all.“I think our government has reached a point where it needs to start releasing knowledge about advanced science and physics,” he says.But there’s a catch. That same government needs to protect the secrets behind this tech, especially if it’s linked to national defense. So, on one hand, they want to move toward transparency. On the other, they’re still trying to keep engineers and scientists from spilling the classified stuff.It’s a major internal conflict and according to Fowler, that’s what’s really slowing down disclosure. It’s not about UFOs. It’s about how much science they’re willing to let the public see.Is All of This True?We can’t say for sure. Fowler’s not offering hard proof, yet.

AARO Releases Video of Unresolved 2023 UAP Case in the Middle East

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHhk12LopdM

According to AARO, the report came from a U.S. military Service and included eight minutes and fifteen seconds of video footage recorded using an infrared sensor. The footage shows what appears to be a thermal contrast — essentially, an area in the infrared field of view that stands out from the surrounding background, hinting at the possible presence of a physical object.Unfortunately, without supporting telemetry or multi-modal sensor readings (such as radar or optical tracking), we cannot determine whether the observed signature is a true physical object, a reflection, a thermal emission, or simply a sensor artifact.

The Hidden Truth Behind Advanced Tech and the Space Program

It seems we are sitting on the precipice of groundbreaking, game-changing technology that has been kept behind closed doors for far too long. But what if the truth isn't what we’ve been led to believe? What if the cutting-edge tech we hear about in the news isn’t the true frontier of innovation? Let’s unpack a few thoughts that have been bouncing around for decades, particularly in the realms of military aviation and space exploration.The F-22First, let’s talk about the F-22. The F-22 Raptor, one of the most advanced fighter jets ever created, was canceled—one of the most baffling decisions made in modern military history. The F-22 wasn’t just a leap forward in technology; it was a statement of power, precision, and unmatched stealth capabilities. Yet, it was killed off before it could truly live up to its potential.Why?The answer could be a deeper, more covert shift in technology that we aren’t privy to. The cancellation of such a key asset might suggest that we’re already beyond the F-22’s capabilities. Perhaps, behind the scenes, we have tech so advanced that the F-22 simply doesn’t fit into the new paradigm. The cancellation was strategic, not because of cost, but because the military already had something better in the pipeline. We’re talking about a shift so profound that even the most advanced aircraft would seem outdated in comparison.NASA’s DeclineNASA’s Space Program is another area where strange contradictions emerge. Despite being the pioneer of space exploration, the U.S. has made curious decisions in the past few decades. Major cuts to NASA’s budget, a lack of a meaningful replacement for the space shuttle, and an unsettling reliance on the Russians for rides to the ISS all point to a program that seems to be stuck in a rut. Hitching rides with the Russians? That’s not something we would have expected from the world’s leading space power. But perhaps there’s a reason we’re not pushing forward in the same way we used to.NASA’s silence on the moon race and the absence of a major new mission suggest that perhaps we’ve already gone beyond what the public knows. Could it be that the real space advancements are happening in private industry? There have been rumors for years that private corporations have access to technology far beyond what the average person can fathom. In fact, it's widely believed that the private sector has been working with technologies from non-human intelligence (NHI) for decades. The idea of "soft disclosure" is gaining traction, with incremental pieces of information leaking out as if to prepare the public for what’s to come.The Evolution of Military TechLook at military aviation over the years. The B-1 bomber, for example, was canceled because it was rendered obsolete by stealth technology. And stealth technology isn’t new. We’ve had it for over 45 years, but the narrative remains that it’s cutting edge. Meanwhile, the world has moved on. There’s something else out there, something more advanced, that we’ve yet to fully comprehend or acknowledge.There’s speculation—based on what insiders have suggested—that we already have anti-gravity or anti-inertia craft in our possession. These technologies are said to be so far advanced that they can’t be released to the public without disrupting the political and economic order as we know it.Private IndustryIn fact, private industry is rumored to have had access to these technologies for years, and they’ve been piecing out the material to see if companies could reverse-engineer the materials and technologies developed from non-human intelligence. But there’s a catch: the material science required to understand and replicate these advancements hasn’t been fully figured out yet. That’s why it’s likely that, for now, these technologies will remain hidden in the hands of the few, with big tech companies potentially set to play a central role in unlocking their full potential.It’s easy to dismiss these ideas as conspiracy or science fiction, but consider this: when major military and space programs are cut or redirected, when the world’s most advanced technologies are seemingly abandoned, it raises a red flag. The game-changing innovations we’ve been promised may not be as far off as we think—they might already be here, hidden from the public eye, waiting for the right moment to be revealed.

Bipartisan Task Force Joins UAP Disclosure Fund to Explore UAP Data’s Impact on Science, Security, and Innovation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yFwUdbSpko

The UAP Disclosure Foundation (UAPDF), in partnership with the bipartisan Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, is hosting a nonpartisan briefing designed to provide members of Congress with critical insights into the scientific, national security, and innovation dimensions of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP)–related data. This briefing aims to inform policymakers about the importance of transparent access to UAP information, emphasizing how such data could advance scientific research, bolster national defense strategies, and spark groundbreaking technological innovations. By bringing together experts and lawmakers in a collaborative setting, the event highlights the growing bipartisan interest in understanding the broader implications of UAP and the urgent need to reassess longstanding secrecy around this topic.

The Great UFO Data Scrub: Are We Witnessing a Digital Cover-Up?

In recent months, a troubling trend has emerged that’s raising alarms across the UFO disclosure community: a coordinated and systemic effort to erase, alter, or suppress critical information related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) from the internet. Whether by coincidence or design, this apparent campaign is targeting key figures and statements that have shaped the modern disclosure narrative.One glaring example is the sudden sabotage of Harald Malmgreen's Wikipedia page. Once a valuable source for background on his involvement in UAP investigations, it has been reduced to a shell of its former self—if not wiped out entirely—by what appears to be a malicious actor. Even more disturbing is the outright deletion of Christopher Mellon's Wikipedia page. Mellon, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense and one of the most credible voices advocating for UFO transparency, has played a major role in legitimizing the discussion in Washington. His erasure sends a chilling message: credibility won’t protect you from digital oblivion.This isn’t an isolated incident.The UFO community on Reddit recently unearthed another shocking case of information manipulation. A user named WonderTwin01 highlighted that the Associated Press (AP) appears to have censored a crucial part of the July 2023 congressional testimony by whistleblower David Grusch—specifically, his reference to the recovery of “non-human biologics.” The AP version of the video cuts away just before Grusch makes this now-infamous claim. Fortunately, alternate streams—such as the one from The Independent—retain the full, unedited footage.The censorship was obvious to anyone comparing the versions. WonderTwin01 put it bluntly:“I recently went back to the original hearing where David Grusch made his famous statement about biologics being found by the US and I noticed a strange cut/edit while I was watching. Turns out the AP cut out his statement... So incredibly strange and obvious. Clear censorship by the AP.”This edit is not a matter of trimming content for time or clarity—it’s an act of deliberate omission that fundamentally alters the record of a historic moment.Let’s recap:Key Wikipedia pages are being deleted or manipulated.Congressional testimony is being edited by mainstream media outlets.Whistleblowers, including decorated veterans, are being discredited by leaks of their personal medical records.This is more than negligence. It's an active distortion of the public record.What’s most damning is how these tactics echo historical efforts to control narratives through censorship and disinformation. The U.S. is often portrayed as the bastion of free speech and transparency, yet here we are, watching digital manipulation unfold in real time, all seemingly to suppress public access to truths about our place in the universe.As always, the internet remembers. But only if we fight to preserve what remains.

DoD Confirms Existence of UAP Video But Refuses Release

Late last year, Rogue UAP Insider dropped an intriguing breadcrumb: they suggested filing FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests for a supposedly classified UAP video titled "UAP13SEP2020IntelClip.mp4". At the time, this seemed like just another needle in the sprawling haystack of UAP rumors. But the plot thickened when, recently, the Department of Defense officially acknowledged the existence of records related to the file — while simultaneously denying their release under national security, deliberative process, and law enforcement exemptions.When the DoD admits that a record exists but refuses to release it on these grounds, it typically signals that the content is highly sensitive — not just in what it shows, but possibly in how it was captured. Some speculate that releasing the footage could expose classified technologies, like the capabilities of advanced imaging or sensor platforms used by the U.S. military.The filename itself — UAP13SEP2020IntelClip.mp4 — hints at a date: September 13, 2020. A little digging led curious researchers to a MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) report from that very day. The sighting took place over Whitesboro, New York, and described an object that appeared to be stationary, dripping molten material — a phenomenon not unfamiliar to longtime UAP watchers.Given the proximity to military installations and the relatively stable nature of the sighting, it’s entirely plausible that the military captured clear NV (night vision) or IR (infrared) footage of the event. If so, it would represent one of the clearest documented UAP encounters — exactly the kind of material that disclosure advocates have been chasing for decades.Rogue UAP Insider hasn’t stopped at teasing hidden videos. Recently, they also dropped a bombshell on Twitter: a whistleblower and firsthand UAP witness is expected to come forward this weekend via a popular UAP podcast. This witness will reportedly back key figures in the disclosure movement, including Lue Elizondo, Jay Stratton, and Mario Woods — names that should be very familiar to anyone who’s been following the modern UAP saga. If true, this could be a major moment for the disclosure movement, especially as momentum seems to be building in government, media, and public interest sectors.So What’s Next?So far, two separate FOIA requests for the "UAP13SEP2020IntelClip.mp4" have been tracked — one filed with U.S. Cyber Command and another with Space Force. While Cyber Command has flatly denied the release, Space Force’s request is still listed as "awaiting response."Whether more information trickles out soon remains to be seen.